Environmentalists Sue EPA over Non-Road Vehicle Emissions Regulations
“Once again, the Bush Administration is demonstrating utter contempt for protecting the nation’s environment. By allowing the indefinite sale of dirty two-stroke engines in snowmobiles, backing off on catalytic converters for all-terrain vehicles, and failing to regulate noise pollution, we will sacrifice air quality, public health, and wildlife,” said Russell Long, Bluewater Network’s Executive Director. “We refuse to let Mr. Bush get away with this.”
For example, EPA’s newest regulations require snowmobile manufacturers to reduce hydrocarbon emissions by only 50 percent, while readily available four-stroke snowmobiles already on the market reduce hydrocarbon emissions by more than 95 percent. According to the California Air Resources Board, a day’s ride using a conventional two-stroke engine similar to those employed by most snowmobiles in the U.S. releases the same amount of pollution as driving a modern automobile 100,000 miles. The EPA rule also backs away from an earlier requirement for all-terrain vehicle (ATV) manufacturers to install catalytic converters that greatly reduce smog-forming emissions, despite the fact that catalysts are already used on many on-road motorcycles, and have been used in automobiles since 1975.
Additionally, the EPA failed to regulate noise from any of the categories in this rulemaking. Federal law requires the EPA to establish standards for engines which are major source of noise. On average, recreational vehicles such as snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles and jetskis emit noise at levels ranging from 81 to 111 decibels (dB). Unfortunately, recreational vehicles hinder the American public’s ability to enjoy the natural peace and quiet of their federal lands and waters. According to a recent report by the General Accounting Office (GAO), off-road vehicles such as snowmobiles and jetskis are permitted in nearly 50 percent of the areas managed by the four major federal land management agencies (National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. Forest Service). In addition, the EPA’s has refused to require thrillcraft manufacturers to place multi-tiered environmental labels on their machines, which would allow consumers to purchase the least polluting vehicles.
Contact:
Dr. Russell Long (415) 544-0790, ext. 18
Sean Smith (415) 544-0790, ext 19
One of the world’s leading international nonprofit organizations, Environmental Defense Fund (edf.org) creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships. With more than 3 million members and offices in the United States, China, Mexico, Indonesia and the European Union, EDF’s scientists, economists, attorneys and policy experts are working in 28 countries to turn our solutions into action. Connect with us on Twitter @EnvDefenseFund
Latest press releases
-
EPA Clears Way for California Clean Car Standards
December 18, 2024 -
Department of Energy Study On Environmental and Economic Impacts of U.S. Natural Gas Exports Shows Urgent Need to Cut Methane Pollution
December 17, 2024 -
Permitting Solutions for a Strong, Clean and Reliable Grid Must Continue
December 16, 2024 -
Supreme Court Will Not Consider Constitutional Challenges to California Clean Vehicle
December 16, 2024 -
D.C. Circuit Hears Oral Argument in Challenges to EPA’s National Health-Based Standards for Soot
December 16, 2024 -
Supreme Court Will Not Consider Challenges to California Core Authority to Establish Clean Vehicle Standards Brought by Oil and Gas Interests
December 13, 2024