Davenport Close To Model For River Cities, Says Environmental Defense
Environmental Defense today released the following statement by senior attorney Tim Searchinger about flooding on the Mississippi River and Davenport, Iowa:
“In recent days, Federal Emergency Management Agency Director Joseph Allbaugh has blamed Davenport, Iowa, for failing to build a floodwall and has suggested that federal taxpayers are subsidizing Davenport’s ‘aesthetics.’ On this point, Director Allbaugh is dangerously misinformed. History has shown that levees mean more damages overall because they encourage floodplain development.
“While not perfect, Davenport, Iowa, is close to a model for how towns along large rivers should deal with the inevitable floods. It does not have a floodwall, but for the most part, it has cleared buildings from frequently flooded areas and uses these areas for parks. In 1993, when floods caused more than $12 billion in damages in the region, Davenport suffered only a few million dollars in damage. The vast bulk of damages occurred instead where floodwaters overtopped floodwalls and levees and destroyed the homes, airports and infrastructure built in the false security of a levee. In 1993, Chesterfield, Missouri, alone suffered hundreds of millions in damages. By not building a floodwall, Davenport has avoided these tragic mistakes.
“In addition to cutting the city off from the river, the millions of dollars a floodwall would cost make little economic sense precisely because Davenport has kept most buildings out of harm’s way. A cheaper solution is simply to remove or floodproof the remaining 100 or so flood-damaged buildings.
“Davenport could yet improve. Although it relocated many buildings after the flood of 1993, a number of damaged homes were rebuilt in the floodplain. Director Allbaugh is right that the federal government should not pay over and over again to rebuild these homes. Relocation or floodproofing is the answer. Director Allbaugh deserves credit for his proposals to reform the flood insurance program.
“The flood of 1993 caused its billions in damages despite billions of dollars in private and public levees. By contrast, relocation after 1993 has truly worked. Davenport needs a little more relocation, not a flood wall,” said Searchinger.
One of the world’s leading international nonprofit organizations, Environmental Defense Fund (edf.org) creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships. With more than 3 million members and offices in the United States, China, Mexico, Indonesia and the European Union, EDF’s scientists, economists, attorneys and policy experts are working in 28 countries to turn our solutions into action. Connect with us on Twitter @EnvDefenseFund
Latest press releases
-
Department of Energy Study On Environmental and Economic Impacts of U.S. Natural Gas Exports Shows Urgent Need to Cut Methane Pollution
December 17, 2024 -
Permitting Solutions for a Strong, Clean and Reliable Grid Must Continue
December 16, 2024 -
Supreme Court Will Not Consider Constitutional Challenges to California Clean Vehicle
December 16, 2024 -
D.C. Circuit Hears Oral Argument in Challenges to EPA’s National Health-Based Standards for Soot
December 16, 2024 -
Supreme Court Will Not Consider Challenges to California Core Authority to Establish Clean Vehicle Standards Brought by Oil and Gas Interests
December 13, 2024 -
EPA Limits on Climate Pollution from Power Plants Are “Vital Safeguards,” Have “Firm Legal Grounding”
December 6, 2024