Conservation Groups Praise Court Victory for San Joaquin Air District

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Contact:
Paul Cort, Earthjustice, (510) 550-6725, [email protected]
Camille Kustin, Environmental Defense Fund, (916) 492-4682, [email protected]
Gordon Nipp, Sierra Club – Bakersfield, (661) 477-1140, [email protected]
 
Fresno, CA – A federal judge today dismissed a suit by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) that sought to invalidate a landmark regulation in the San JoaquinValley to reduce air pollution from new development projects. The court rejected NAHB’s basis for the suit, that the Clean Air Act preempted the regulation, known as the Indirect Source Rule (ISR).
 
The Indirect Source Rule was adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District in December 2005 and took effect in March 2006. It requires developers to mitigate pollution from the increased traffic generated by new development. Developers can either incorporate into their projects elements that will minimize these traffic-related emissions such as building near public transit, adding bicycle lanes, or building walkable shopping into the plans, or pay a mitigation fee to the district to be used to purchase off-site emission reductions.  

“We’re glad to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the San Joaquin air district when it does something right,” said Paul Cort an attorney for Earthjustice who filed a friend of the court brief in the case. “No special interest should have a free ride in a region where schools warn parents to keep children indoors on bad air days.” 

On June 6, 2007, the NAHB filed a challenge in federal district court seeking to invalidate the rule, claiming that only the federal government can regulate these activities.

In the ruling today, Judge Lawrence O’Neill rejected the NAHB’s challenges, finding the indirect source rule an appropriate exercise by the District to address air pollution under the federal Clean Air Act.

“Once again the courts have ruled in favor of this common sense regulation to clean up the air in one of the most polluted areas in the country,” said Kathryn Phillips, manager of the California Clean Air for Life Campaign for Environmental Defense Fund. “It’s time for the trade associations to back off and follow the lead of the hundreds of California developers who have complied with this pollution-cutting measure.”

Gordon Nipp of the Sierra Club’s Bakersfield chapter said, “Every sector must do its part to help clean up our air in the San JoaquinValley, some of the worst in the nation. Agriculture is learning to comply with the federal Clean Air Act, and now the homebuilders will join the fight against air pollution, despite their legal recalcitrance.”

Earthjustice represented Environmental Defense and the Kern-Kaweah (Bakersfield), Tehipite (Fresno), and Mother Lode (Sacramento) Chapters of the Sierra Club in the intervention.

 

One of the world’s leading international nonprofit organizations, Environmental Defense Fund (edf.org) creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships. With more than 3 million members and offices in the United States, China, Mexico, Indonesia and the European Union, EDF’s scientists, economists, attorneys and policy experts are working in 28 countries to turn our solutions into action. Connect with us on Twitter @EnvDefenseFund